Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
AAPG Bulletin SEARCH
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

AAPG Bulletin; May 2002; v. 86; no. 5; p. 919-921; DOI: 10.1306/61EEDBDE-173E-11D7-8645000102C1865D
© 2002 American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Discussion and Reply

Sequence Stratigraphic Responses to Shoreline-Perpendicular Growth Faulting in Shallow Marine Reservoirs of the Champion Field, Offshore Brunei Darussalam, South China Sea: Discussion

Marc B. Edwards1

1 5430 Dumfries, Houston, Texas, 77096; marc@marcedwards.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

I do not agree with the conclusion reached by Hodgetts et al. (2001) that a deltaic shoreline in two adjacent growth fault blocks was simultaneously prograding and retrograding, for reasons explained in this article. My principal objection is illustrated in their figure 14. The block diagram and paleoenvironmental map (Hodgetts et al., 2001, figure 14c, d) show the onset of growth faulting. As the fault begins to offset the depositional surface, Hodgetts et al. (2001) argue that the greater subsidence associated with the hanging-wall (downthrown) block caused updip migration of the shoreline, while the shoreline continued to prograde in the footwall (upthrown) block. If, however, offset on the fault yielded no more than several meters of relief on the sea floor, then the delta would merely heal the surface and continue to prograde in the hanging-wall block, where the succession would be thicker than in the footwall block (overall layer thickening). This is what is observed in numerous cases in the northern Gulf of Mexico Basin (e.g., Curtis, 1970; Curtis and Picou, 1978) and the Niger Delta (Weber, 1971). Several examples that I have studied and described in publications include the Paleocene-Eocene Wilcox Group (Edwards, 1980, 1981; Winker and Edwards, 1983); the Oligocene Frio Formation (Edwards, 1995), the Eocene Yegua Formation (Edwards, 1990, 1991), and the lower Miocene (Edwards, 1994, . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
A. O. Owoyemi and B. J. Willis
Depositional Patterns Across Syndepositional Normal Faults, Niger Delta, Nigeria
Journal of Sedimentary Research, February 1, 2006; 76(2): 346 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
Sequence Stratigraphic Responses to Shoreline-Perpendicular Growth Faulting in Shallow Marine Reservoirs of the Champion Field, Offshore Brunei Darussalam, South China Sea: Reply
AAPG Bulletin, May 1, 2002; 86(5): 922 - 924.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)