Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
AAPG Bulletin SEARCH
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

AAPG Bulletin; September 2007; v. 91; no. 9; p. 1342-1344; DOI: 10.1306/04290707031
© 2007 American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

DISCUSSION AND REPLY

Structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite reservoir facies: An overview: Reply

Graham R. Davies1 and Langhorne B. Smith, Jr.2

1 Graham Davies Geological Consultants Ltd., Alastair Ross Technology Centre, 3553 31st Street N. W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2L 2K7; gdgc@telus.net
2 Reservoir Characterization Group, Room 3140 CEC, New York State Museum, Albany, New York 12230; lsmith@mail.nysed.gov

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

We welcome the comments by Friedman (2007) on our review article on structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite. However, we disagree strongly with many of his comments and conclusions. We find it unfortunate that he repeats the statement of Machel and Lonnee (2002) that the term "hydrothermal dolomite" is confusing and meaningless. Both the Machel and Lonnee (2002) article and the discussion by Friedman show a basic lack of understanding of the process of hydrothermal dolomitization and how common dolomite of structurally controlled hydrothermal origin appears to be worldwide.

Because Friedman (2007) infers that the term hydrothermal dolomite is confusing and meaningless and follows Machel and Lonnee (2002) in considering it a product of poor definition, it is useful to repeat the definition used in our article (Davies and Smith, 2006). We begin first by recognizing the widely acknowledged definition of hydrothermal by White (1957, p. 1638) as "of or pertaining to any water that is appreciably warmer than the surrounding environment." We then expand the definition of structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomitization as "dolomitization occurring under burial conditions of elevated (but commonly transient) temperature and pressure by fluids, typically brines, with temperature and pressure of the fluid higher than the ambient temperature and pressure of the host formation (typically limestone), commonly emplaced peripheral to or along extensional or transtensional faults or fracture systems, but with a strong depositional facies to early diagenetic control on replacement textures and fabrics, and pore type and volume." Although quite long in its expanded form, we fail to see where this definition is confusing or meaningless; it certainly . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)