Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
AAPG Bulletin SEARCH
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

AAPG Bulletin; September 2007; v. 91; no. 9; p. 1339-1341; DOI: 10.1306/04300706142
© 2007 American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

DISCUSSION AND REPLY

Structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite reservoir facies: An overview: Discussion

Gerald M. Friedman1

1 Northeastern Science Foundation, 15 Third Street, P.O. Box 746, Troy, New York 12181; gmfriedman@thesciencefoundation.com

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

THOUGHTS ABOUT THE TERM "HYDROTHERMAL DOLOMITE"

One of the issues of the AAPG Bulletin (v. 90, no. 11) was concerned with "hydrothermal dolomite reservoirs," specifically "hydrothermal dolomite fields" (Davies and Smith, 2006). The term "hydrothermal dolomite" is confusing and meaningless (Machel and Lonnee, 2002). To study the origin of dolomite and its hydrothermal depositional setting, I examined modern settings, including the Mediterranean Sea (Friedman, 1991) (Figure 1). The shallow-water facies in this modern setting consists of dolomite and gypsum. The rocks range from almost pure gypsum to pure tough dolostone so thoroughly cemented that sampling required hammer and chisel. X-ray diffraction analysis indicates the presence of minor anhydrite. Sporadic aragonitic gastropods occur, but fossils are otherwise absent. Under the microscope, it is a peloidal micrite (dolomicrite). The {delta}13CPDB of the dolostone is –39.3 to –31.2{per thousand}. These strongly negative {delta}13C values suggest that carbon of the dolomite came from methane. Methane forms when all sulfate has been reduced. Bacterial reaction was responsible for dolomite formation through the methane pathway. This syngenetic dolomite is like most dolomites of hydrothermal origin, but my students and I avoid this confusing bandwagon term.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (18K):



 
Figure 1 Approximate temperatures at which Holocene intertidal carbonate sediments formed, calculated from isotopic signatures.

 
Three classes of dolostone have been recognized, which have been termed syngenetic, diagenetic, and epigenetic (Friedman and Sanders, 1967). The purpose of this classification has been for the orderly discussion of the subject and to facilitate descriptive study and genetic interpretation.

The term . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
G. R. Davies and L. B. Smith Jr.
Structurally controlled hydrothermal dolomite reservoir facies: An overview: Reply
AAPG Bulletin, September 1, 2007; 91(9): 1342 - 1344.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)