Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
AAPG Bulletin SEARCH
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

AAPG Bulletin; September 2009; v. 93; no. 9; p. 1183-1208; DOI: 10.1306/05110908145
© 2009 American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sech, R. P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Three-dimensional modeling of a shoreface-shelf parasequence reservoir analog: Part 2. Geologic controls on fluid flow and hydrocarbon recovery

Matthew D. Jackson1, Gary J. Hampson2 and Richard P. Sech3

1 Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BP, United Kingdom; m.d.jackson{at}imperial.ac.uk
2 Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BP, United Kingdom
3 Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BP, United Kingdom; present address: ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, P.O. Box 2189, Houston, Texas 77252

Matthew Jackson is a senior lecturer in reservoir engineering in the Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College, London. He holds a B.S. degree in physics from Imperial College and a Ph.D. in geological fluid mechanics from the University of Liverpool. His research interests include simulation of multiphase flow through porous media, representation of geologic heterogeneity in simulation models, and downhole monitoring and control in instrumented wells.

Gary Hampson is a senior lecturer in sedimentary geology in the Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College, London. He holds a B.A. degree in natural sciences from the University of Cambridge and a Ph.D. in sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy from the University of Liverpool. His research interests lie in the understanding of siliciclastic depositional systems and their preserved stratigraphy, and in applying this knowledge to reservoir characterization.

Richard Sech is a research scientist at ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, Houston. He holds a B.S. degree in exploration geology from Cardiff University, an M.S. degree in reservoir evaluation and management from Heriot-Watt University, and a Ph.D. in petroleum engineering from Imperial College, London. His research interests are in reservoir modeling and quantifying the influence of geologic heterogeneity on fluid flow behavior.

ABSTRACT

Wave-dominated, shoreface-shelf parasequences are commonly modeled as simple layer-cake reservoirs, yet analysis of modern and ancient analogs demonstrates that these intervals contain a more complex physical stratigraphy. We investigate the impact of depositional and diagenetic heterogeneity associated with gently dipping clinoform surfaces on fluid flow and recovery during water flooding, using a three-dimensional model reconstructed from a well-exposed outcrop analog. We demonstrate that the volume of oil in place is affected by variations in facies thickness associated with interfingering along clinoforms, whereas waterflood sweep efficiency is affected by barriers to flow along clinoform surfaces, such as calcite-cemented layers, mudstones, and siltstones.

Sweep efficiency is low when water flooding is down depositional dip because oil is bypassed at the toe of each clinothem as water flows preferentially through high-quality sandstone facies in the upper part of the parasequence. Sweep efficiency is higher when water flooding is up depositional dip because the gravity-driven, downward flow of water sweeps poorer-quality sandstone facies in the lower part of the parasequence. In both cases, injectors may offer limited pressure support to producers.

Water flooding along depositional strike yields good pressure support but poor sweep because the gravity-driven flow of water into the lower part of the parasequence is significantly reduced. This yields highly variable fluid saturations but a uniform pressure gradient, which is consistent with pressure and fluid saturation data from the mature Rannoch Formation reservoir, Brent field, United Kingdom North Sea. Simple layer-cake models fail to capture the range of flow behaviors described above and overpredict recovery by up to 20% as a result.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
R. P. Sech, M. D. Jackson, and G. J. Hampson
Three-dimensional modeling of a shoreface-shelf parasequence reservoir analog: Part 1. Surface-based modeling to capture high-resolution facies architecture
AAPG Bulletin, September 1, 2009; 93(9): 1155 - 1181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)