Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
AAPG Bulletin SEARCH
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

AAPG Bulletin; April 2009; v. 93; no. 4; p. 535-561; DOI: 10.1306/12220808082
© 2009 American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Madof, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Anders, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Stratigraphic controls on a salt-withdrawal intraslope minibasin, north-central Green Canyon, Gulf of Mexico: Implications for misinterpreting sea level change

Andrew S. Madof1, Nicholas Christie-Blick2 and Mark H. Anders3

1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964; amadof{at}ldeo.columbia.edu
2 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964
3 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964

Andrew S. Madof is a Ph.D. candidate at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. He received his B.A. degree from Oberlin College in 2000, his M.S. degree from the University of Kansas in 2006, and his M.Phil. degree from Columbia University in 2008. His research focuses on the noneustatic controls on both shallow-marine and deep-water systems and particularly on the role of deformation in modulating accommodation.

Nicholas Christie-Blick is a professor of earth and environmental sciences at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. He completed his Ph.D. at the University of California, Santa Barbara, in 1979, and was a research scientist at Exxon Production Research Company in Houston for three years in the early 1980s. Christie-Blick's research and publications deal with such varied topics as sedimentation processes, crustal deformation, and deep-time Earth history, with emphasis on challenging conventional thinking and resolving outstanding disagreements.

Mark H. Anders is an associate professor of earth and environmental sciences at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. He received his Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley in 1989 working with Walter Alvarez, and joined the Columbia faculty that year. He and his students work on a wide range of topics related to faults and the faulting process, including fault growth, the effects of magmatism on extension, and more recently, the mechanics of large block slides.

ABSTRACT

Three-dimensional seismic data from the Fuji basin, a salt-controlled intraslope minibasin in north-central Green Canyon, Gulf of Mexico, reveal complex interactions between gravity- and suspension-driven sedimentation. Seismic volumes for late Pleistocene (~470 ka) to Holocene fill within the Fuji basin consist of approximately 45% mass transport complexes (MTCs), 5% channelized sandy turbidites, and 50% hemipelagites and muddy turbidites. At least ten MTCs within the Fuji basin flowed radially toward its depocenter, either from basin flanks (i.e., intrabasinal) or as a result of larger-scale salt motion (i.e., extrabasinal). Sediment transport directions are inferred on the basis of elongate basal incisions and smaller-scale scours, head scarps, fold orientation within the complexes, and stratigraphic thinning trends at downdip margins. An amalgamated set of three channelized sandy turbidite complexes less than 350 m (1148 ft) thick and 3 km (1.8 mi) across represents the main sand delivery pathway into the Fuji basin. These deposits are thought to be due to shelf bypass, and possibly, to proximity to the Pleistocene shoreline. Hemipelagites and muddy turbidites are homogeneous, and their thickness is relatively consistent at basin scale. This facies represents background sedimentation.

A process-driven model has been developed involving halokinetic autocyclicity as the primary control on sedimentation in the Fuji basin. Passive salt motion accounts better for both the directions of sediment transport and the frequency of late Pleistocene–Holocene MTCs than currently popular eustatic and steady-state bathymetric models. The conclusion is significant in casting doubt on the generally assumed importance of eustasy in controlling off-shelf lowstand sedimentation and in implying marked variations in stratigraphic details at length scales of less than 10 km (6.2 mi).







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)