Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
AAPG Bulletin SEARCH
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

AAPG Bulletin; June 2007; v. 91; no. 6; p. 915-939; DOI: 10.1306/12150606017
© 2007 American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rohrman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Prospectivity of volcanic basins: Trap delineation and acreage de-risking

Max Rohrman1

1 Shell Exploration and Production, P.O. Box 40, 4098 Tananger, Norway; max.rohrman{at}shell.com

Max Rohrman received an M.Sc. degree from Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, in 1989 and a Ph.D. from Free University, Amsterdam, Netherlands, in 1995. From 1997 to 1999, he was a basin modeling geologist with Integrated Exploration Systems. From 1999 to 2002, he worked for Landmark and subsequently joined Shell in 2002. Since then, he has worked as a seismic interpreter in Scotland and Norway on North Sea and Atlantic margin acreage, as well as international projects.

Prospect delineation in volcanic basins is commonly hampered by poor sub-basalt imaging. Recent seismic advances focusing on low frequencies have significantly enhanced structural imaging, but not the seismic resolution. Currently, the sub-basalt play is mainly a structural play. On the North Atlantic margin, success has been booked with the discovery of the sub-basalt anticlinal Corrib gas field, offshore Ireland. However, not all sub-basalt anticlines observed on seismic data are valid prospects because some of them are located directly above large igneous complexes, displaying highly overmature and overcompacted sedimentary sections with little porosity. Use of filtered gravity and magnetic data and potentially seismic velocity analysis can easily delineate and subsequently de-risk these prospects. Sill intrusion can generate subtle anticlinal traps that might be valid prospects because the thermal effect of sills is relatively limited. Thus, there is less chance of generating an overmature prospect, unless the sills occur in high numbers. Filtered gravity and magnetic data sets, in combination with local geology, can be used in the early stages of sub-basalt exploration to low-grade regions with a high amount of large intrusives. This approach is highlighted for the North Atlantic volcanic province and offshore western India. Potentially, the most prospective regions of volcanic basins are where flood basalts simply blanket sedimentary basins without intrusives in the direct subsurface. In this case, basalt thickness estimation and associated burial depth become an important parameter to estimate prospectivity. Seismic modeling suggests that it might be difficult to constrain basalt thickness from seismic sections without reliable calibration. Although an increase in volcanism in sedimentary basins generally tends to increase risks, proper integration of geophysical and geological data should be able to better evaluate volcanic basins.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)