Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
AAPG Bulletin SEARCH
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

AAPG Bulletin; January 2007; v. 91; no. 1; p. 69-96; DOI: 10.1306/08090605167
© 2007 American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qi, L.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Geostatistical three-dimensional modeling of oolite shoals, St. Louis Limestone, southwest Kansas

Lianshuang Qi1, Timothy R. Carr2 and Robert H. Goldstein3

1 Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047-3726; present address: Chevron Energy Technology Company, 6001 Bollinger Canyon Road, Room D1260, San Ramon, California 94583; liqi{at}chevron.com
2 Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66047-3726; tcarr{at}kgs.ku.edu
3 Department of Geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7613; gold{at}ku.edu

Lianshuang Qi received his Ph.D. in petroleum geology (2005) from the University of Kansas while working as a research assistant at the Kansas Geological Survey. He earned a bachelor's degree (1997) from Jianghan Petroleum Institute, Hubei Province, China, in petroleum geology, followed by a master's degree (2000) in petroleum geology from the Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing, China. He is currently working on the reservoir modeling team of Chevron Energy Technology Company in San Ramon, California. Recent interests include subsurface reservoir characterization; geostatistical reservoir modeling; and simulation of carbonate, shallow-marine, and deep-water reservoirs.

Timothy Carr is codirector of the University of Kansas Energy Research Center and chief of the Energy Research Section of the Kansas Geological Survey. He worked for 13 years with Arco Oil and Gas as a research and exploration geologist. Tim is program manager and team member of several projects, including the creation of a distributed national database on carbon sequestration and value-added sequestration. Recent interests include subsurface geology and geophysics, environmental geology, energy systems, and developing information systems to access and analyze energy and environmental information.

Robert H. Goldstein is the chairman of the Department of Geology and Haas Distinguished Professor at the University of Kansas. He received his B.S. degree from Juniata College, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, and his M.S. degree and Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin. His current research includes the development of the fluid-inclusion tool for diagenetic research, integration of diagenesis with sequence stratigraphy and tectonic setting, and evaluation of controls on the sequence-stratigraphic character of carbonate rocks.

In the Hugoton embayment of southwestern Kansas, reservoirs composed of relatively thin (<4 m; <13.1 ft) oolitic deposits within the St. Louis Limestone have produced more than 300 million bbl of oil. The geometry and distribution of oolitic deposits control the heterogeneity of the reservoirs, resulting in exploration challenges and relatively low recovery. Geostatistical three-dimensional (3-D) models were constructed to quantify the geometry and spatial distribution of oolitic reservoirs, and the continuity of flow units within Big Bow and Sand Arroyo Creek fields.

Lithofacies in uncored wells were predicted from digital logs using a neural network. The tilting effect from the Laramide orogeny was removed to construct restored structural surfaces at the time of deposition. Well data and structural maps were integrated to build 3-D models of oolitic reservoirs using stochastic simulations with geometry data.

Three-dimensional models provide insights into the distribution, the external and internal geometry of oolitic deposits, and the sedimentologic processes that generated reservoir intervals. The structural highs and general structural trend had a significant impact on the distribution and orientation of the oolitic complexes. The depositional pattern and connectivity analysis suggest an overall aggradation of shallow-marine deposits during pulses of relative sea level rise followed by deepening near the top of the St. Louis Limestone. Cemented oolitic deposits were modeled as barriers and baffles and tend to concentrate at the edge of oolitic complexes. Spatial distribution of porous oolitic deposits controls the internal geometry of rock properties. Integrated geostatistical modeling methods can be applicable to other complex carbonate or siliciclastic reservoirs in shallow-marine settings.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
Y. Z. Ma, A. Seto, and E. Gomez
Depositional facies analysis and modeling of the Judy Creek reef complex of the Upper Devonian Swan Hills, Alberta, Canada
AAPG Bulletin, September 1, 2009; 93(9): 1235 - 1256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)