Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
AAPG Bulletin SEARCH
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

AAPG Bulletin; June 2006; v. 90; no. 6; p. 939-962; DOI: 10.1306/01250605100
© 2006 American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norden, B.
Right arrow Articles by Förster, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Thermal conductivity and radiogenic heat production of sedimentary and magmatic rocks in the Northeast German Basin

Ben Norden1 and Andrea Förster2

1 GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany; norden{at}gfz-potsdam.de
2 GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany

Ben Norden received a degree in geology (diploma) from the University of Hamburg in 1999. Since 2000, he has worked at the GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam. He received a master's degree in engineering from the University of Applied Sciences, Cologne, in 2003 and a Ph.D. in geosciences from the Freie Universität, Berlin, in 2004. Norden is currently working on a CO2 storage project. His research interests include heat flow and fluid flow.

Andrea Förster is a staff scientist at the GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Germany. She received a diploma degree in geology, a Ph.D., and a Habilitation degree from the Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Greifswald, Germany. Her current research involves the analysis of the earth thermal field, the determination of heat flow, and explorational aspects of applied geothermics. She is also engaged in research focused on the storage of carbon dioxide in saline aquifers.

Thermal rock properties were determined for the Northeast German Basin, a subbasin of the southern Permian basin in Europe. The new thermal data provide new aspects for the determination of heat flow and for hydrocarbon and geothermal resource evaluation in the basin. Thermal conductivity was measured on drill-core samples using the optical scanning method. Values for Permian and pre-Permian clastic rocks are variable (2.3–4.8 W/m/K) because of different depositional environments, compaction, and cementation reflected in lithology. Permian–Carboniferous igneous rocks show lowest thermal conductivity in basalts (2.2 W/m/K) and highest (3.1 W/m/K) in granitoids. Anisotropy of thermal conductivity in all rocks is low. Formation thermal conductivity was determined by upscaling the values determined for single lithotypes. Radiogenic heat production was determined on drill cores for the upper Paleozoic sediments and igneous rocks. For the younger formations without sample control, a well-log approach was used. The heat production of sedimentary rocks is lowest (0.4 µW/m3) in the Permian (Zechstein) salt and anhydrite and highest (2.1 µW/m3) in the Permian (Rotliegende) clastic rocks. Heat production of the Permian–Carboniferous rhyolites and granitoids is on the order of 2.6–3.8 µW/m3, and heat production of andesites and basaltoids is on the order of 0.9–1.9 and 0.1–0.7 µW/m3, respectively. The contribution to surface heat flow by these up to 2-km (1.2-mi)-thick igneous complexes amounts to 7 mW/m2 at a maximum. On the same order is the total heat budget provided by the supra-Permian sedimentary succession in the basin.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)