Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
AAPG Bulletin SEARCH
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

AAPG Bulletin; February 2006; v. 90; no. 2; p. 193-208; DOI: 10.1306/08250505059
© 2006 American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ortega, O. J.
Right arrow Articles by Laubach, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

GEOHORIZONS

A scale-independent approach to fracture intensity and average spacing measurement

Orlando J. Ortega1, Randall A. Marrett2 and Stephen E. Laubach3

1 Shell International Exploration and Production, 200 North Dairy Ashford, Houston, Texas 77079; orlando.ortega{at}shell.com
2 Department of Geological Sciences, John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712-1101
3 Bureau of Economic Geology, John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78713-8924; steve.laubach{at}beg.utexas.edu

Orlando J. Ortega received his M.S. degree and his Ph.D. from the University of Texas at Austin. He is a structural geologist specializing in fractures for Shell Exploration and Production in Houston, Texas.Randall A. Marrett is an associate professor in the Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin. Quantitative analysis of fracture systems is a major area of his research. He received his Ph.D. from Cornell University.

Stephen E. Laubach is a senior research scientist at the Bureau of Economic Geology, where he conducts research in structural diagenesis. His Ph.D. is from the University of Illinois.

Fracture intensity, the number of fractures per unit length along a sample line, is an important attribute of fracture systems that can be problematic to establish in the subsurface. Lack of adequate constraints on fracture intensity may limit the economic exploitation of fractured reservoirs because intensity describes the abundance of fractures potentially available for fluid flow and the probability of encountering fractures in a borehole. Traditional methods of fracture-intensity measurement are inadequate because they ignore the wide spectrum of fracture sizes found in many fracture systems and the consequent scale dependence of fracture intensity. An alternative approach makes use of fracture-size distributions, which allow more meaningful comparisons between different locations and allow microfractures in subsurface samples to be used for fracture-intensity measurement. Comparisons are more meaningful because sampling artifacts can be recognized and avoided, and because common thresholds of fracture size can be enforced for counting in different locations. Additionally, quantification of the fracture-size distribution provides a mechanism for evaluation of uncertainties. Estimates of fracture intensity using this approach for two carbonate beds in the Sierra Madre Oriental, Mexico, illustrate how size-cognizant measurements cast new light on widely accepted interpretation of geologic controls of fracture intensity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
S. E. Laubach, J. E. Olson, and M. R. Gross
Mechanical and fracture stratigraphy
AAPG Bulletin, November 1, 2009; 93(11): 1413 - 1426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
J. E. Olson, S. E. Laubach, and R. H. Lander
Natural fracture characterization in tight gas sandstones: Integrating mechanics and diagenesis
AAPG Bulletin, November 1, 2009; 93(11): 1535 - 1549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
K. Ghosh and S. Mitra
Structural controls of fracture orientations, intensity, and connectivity, Teton anticline, Sawtooth Range, Montana
AAPG Bulletin, August 1, 2009; 93(8): 995 - 1014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
S.E. Laubach and K. Diaz-Tushman
Laurentian palaeostress trajectories and ephemeral fracture permeability, Cambrian Eriboll Formation sandstones west of the Moine Thrust Zone, NW Scotland
Journal of the Geological Society, March 1, 2009; 166(2): 349 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
E. L. Frost III and C. Kerans
Platform-Margin Trajectory as a Control on Syndepositional Fracture Patterns, Canning Basin, Western Australia
Journal of Sedimentary Research, February 1, 2009; 79(2): 44 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
G. Bertotti, N. Hardebol, J. K. Taal-van Koppen, and S. M. Luthi
Toward a quantitative definition of mechanical units: New techniques and results from an outcropping deep-water turbidite succession (Tanqua-Karoo Basin, South Africa)
AAPG Bulletin, August 1, 2007; 91(8): 1085 - 1098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
G. H. Makel
The modelling of fractured reservoirs: constraints and potential for fracture network geometry and hydraulics analysis
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 292(1): 375 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)