Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
AAPG Bulletin SEARCH
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

AAPG Bulletin; February 2005; v. 89; no. 2; p. 155-175; DOI: 10.1306/09170404042
© 2005 American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Pollastro, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Geologic Notes

Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth basin, north-central Texas: Gas-shale play with multi–trillion cubic foot potential

Scott L. Montgomery1, Daniel M. Jarvie2, Kent A. Bowker3 and Richard M. Pollastro4

1 1511 18th Avenue East; Seattle, Washington 98112; scott.montgomery@prodigy.net
2 Humble Instruments & Services, Inc., Humble Geochemical Services Division, P.O. Box 789 Humble, Texas 77347; danjarvie@humble-inc.com
3 Star of Texas Energy Services, Inc., P.O. Box 131866 Spring, Texas 77393-1866; kb@staroftexasenergy.com
4 Central Energy Resources Team, U.S. Geological Survey, P.O. Box 25046, MS 939, Denver, Colorado 80225; pollastro@usgs.gov

Scott L. Montgomery is a petroleum consultant and author residing in Seattle, Washington. He holds a B.A. degree in English from Knox College (1973) and an M.S. degree in geological sciences from Cornell University (1978). He is the lead author for the Petroleum Frontiers monograph series, published by IHS Energy Group, and has published widely on topics in the petroleum industry.Dan Jarvie is an analytical and interpretive organic geochemist. He has worked on conventional petroleum systems and, since 1984, unconventional oil and gas systems as well. His work on the Barnett Shale spans much of the last decade. He earned a B.S. degree from the University of Notre Dame and was mentored in geochemistry by Don Baker of Rice University and Wallace Dow. He is president of Humble Geochemical Services.

Kent drilled his first Barnett well in 1997 while employed with Chevron U.S.A., as a member of the company's Nonconventional Gas Business Team. He subsequently transferred to Mitchell Energy, where he was involved in the drilling of more than a thousand Barnett wells. Currently, Kent is with Star of Texas Energy Services, Inc., which is also active in the Barnett Shale play. He is a certified and registered (Texas and Wyoming) petroleum geologist.

Richard Pollastro received an M.A. degree in geological science from the State University of New York at Buffalo in 1977. He joined the U.S. Geological Survey in 1978 and has served as a province geologist on the national and world energy assessment projects. His recent accomplishments include petroleum system analysis and resource assessments of the Bend arch–Fort Worth basin with particular focus on Barnett Shale, South Florida basin, and the Arabian Peninsula.

The Mississippian Barnett Shale serves as source, seal, and reservoir to a world-class unconventional natural-gas accumulation in the Fort Worth basin of north-central Texas. The formation is a lithologically complex interval of low permeability that requires artificial stimulation to produce. At present, production is mainly confined to a limited portion of the northern basin where the Barnett Shale is relatively thick (>300 ft; >92 m), organic rich (present-day total organic carbon > 3.0%), thermally mature (vitrinite reflectance > 1.1%), and enclosed by dense limestone units able to contain induced fractures. The most actively drilled area is Newark East field, currently the largest gas field in Texas. Newark East is 400 mi2 (1036 km2) in extent, with more than 2340 producing wells and about 2.7 tcf of booked gas reserves. Cumulative gas production from Barnett Shale wells through 2003 was about 0.8 tcf. Wells in Newark East field typically produce from depths of 7500 ft (2285 m) at rates ranging from 0.5 to more than 4 mmcf/day. Estimated ultimate recoveries per well range from 0.75 to as high as 7.0 bcf. Efforts to extend the current Barnett play beyond the field limits have encountered several challenges, including westward and northward increases in oil saturation and the absence of lithologic barriers to induced fracture growth. Patterns of oil and gas occurrence in the Barnett, in conjunction with maturation and burial-history data, indicate a complex, multiphased thermal evolution, with episodic expulsion of hydrocarbons and secondary cracking of primary oils to gas in portions of the basin where paleotemperatures were especially elevated. These and other data imply a large-potential Barnett resource for the basin as a whole (possibly >200 tcf gas in place). Recent assessment by the U.S. Geological Survey suggests a mean volume of 26.2 tcf of undiscovered, technically recoverable gas in the central Fort Worth basin. Recovery of a significant portion of this undiscovered resource will require continued improvements in geoscientific characterization and approaches to stimulation of the Barnett reservoirs.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
T. J. Kinley, L. W. Cook, J. A. Breyer, D. M. Jarvie, and A. B. Busbey
Hydrocarbon potential of the Barnett Shale (Mississippian), Delaware Basin, west Texas and southeastern New Mexico
AAPG Bulletin, August 1, 2008; 92(8): 967 - 991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologyHome page
G. R.L. Chalmers and R. M. Bustin
Lower Cretaceous gas shales in northeastern British Columbia, Part II: evaluation of regional potential gas resources
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, March 1, 2008; 56(1): 22 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
D. J. K. Ross and R. M. Bustin
Characterizing the shale gas resource potential of Devonian Mississippian strata in the Western Canada sedimentary basin: Application of an integrated formation evaluation
AAPG Bulletin, January 1, 2008; 92(1): 87 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
A. McDonnell, R. G. Loucks, and T. Dooley
Quantifying the origin and geometry of circular sag structures in northern Fort Worth Basin, Texas: Paleocave collapse, pull-apart fault systems, or hydrothermal alteration?
AAPG Bulletin, September 1, 2007; 91(9): 1295 - 1318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
R. M. Pollastro, D. M. Jarvie, R. J. Hill, and C. W. Adams
Geologic framework of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Barnett-Paleozoic total petroleum system, Bend arch-Fort Worth Basin, Texas
AAPG Bulletin, April 1, 2007; 91(4): 405 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
D. M. Jarvie, R. J. Hill, T. E. Ruble, and R. M. Pollastro
Unconventional shale-gas systems: The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment
AAPG Bulletin, April 1, 2007; 91(4): 475 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
K. A. Bowker
Barnett Shale gas production, Fort Worth Basin: Issues and discussion
AAPG Bulletin, April 1, 2007; 91(4): 523 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
H. Zhao, N. B. Givens, and B. Curtis
Thermal maturity of the Barnett Shale determined from well-log analysis
AAPG Bulletin, April 1, 2007; 91(4): 535 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
R. M. Pollastro
Total petroleum system assessment of undiscovered resources in the giant Barnett Shale continuous (unconventional) gas accumulation, Fort Worth Basin, Texas
AAPG Bulletin, April 1, 2007; 91(4): 551 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
R. G. Loucks and S. C. Ruppel
Mississippian Barnett Shale: Lithofacies and depositional setting of a deep-water shale-gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin, Texas
AAPG Bulletin, April 1, 2007; 91(4): 579 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
J. F. W. Gale, R. M. Reed, and J. Holder
Natural fractures in the Barnett Shale and their importance for hydraulic fracture treatments
AAPG Bulletin, April 1, 2007; 91(4): 603 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologyHome page
D. J.K. Ross and R. M. Bustin
Shale gas potential of the Lower Jurassic Gordondale Member, northeastern British Columbia, Canada
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, March 1, 2007; 55(1): 51 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
E. C. Sullivan, K. J. Marfurt, C. Blumentritt, and M. Ammerman
Seismic geomorphology of Palaeozoic collapse features in the Fort Worth Basin (USA)
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 277(1): 187 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
T. E. Ewing
Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth basin, north-central Texas: Gas-shale play with multi-trillion cubic foot potential: Discussion
AAPG Bulletin, June 1, 2006; 90(6): 963 - 966.
[Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)