|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 The Rock Fracture Project, Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, California; Current address: BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc., P.O. Box 196612 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6612; stephan{at}pangea.stanford.edu; stephan.bergbauer{at}bp.com
2 Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, California
3 Phillips Petroleum Company, Bartlesville, Oklahoma
Stephan Bergbauer is a development geologist with BP Exploration (Alaska). He received a B.S. degree in geology from the RWTH Aachen, Germany, an M.S. degree in geology from the University of Hawaii at Manoa, and a Ph.D. from Stanford University. The research described in this paper is part of Stephan's Ph.D. work with the Rock Fracture Project at Stanford University. Stephan's thesis investigates the folding and fracturing of sedimentary strata.Tapan Mukerji is a research associate with the Stanford Rock Physics Lab at Stanford University. He received his Ph.D. in geophysics in 1995 from Stanford University, and his B.S. and M.S. degrees from Banaras Hindu University, India. His research expertise includes rock physics, wave phenomena, and geostatistics. Tapan Mukerji is a co-author of The Rock Physics Handbook and is a recipient of Society of Exploration Geophysicists' Karcher Award (2000) for outstanding young geophysicists.
Peter Hennings is the structure and tectonics technology leader at Phillips Petroleum in Houston, Texas. His role at Phillips involves exploration and production consultation worldwide, technology development and implementation, and training. From 1988 to 1999, Peter worked for Mobil Technology in a similar capacity. Peter received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in geology from Texas A&M University and his Ph.D. in geology from the University of Texas, Austin.
Fractures, which are common structural heterogeneities in geological folds and domes, impact the charge, seal, and trapping potential of hydrocarbon reservoirs. Because of their effects on reservoir quality, the numerical prediction of fractures has recently been the focus of petroleum geoscientists. A horizon's curvature is commonly used to infer the state of deformation in those strata. It is assumed that areas of elevated calculated curvatures underwent elevated deformation, resulting in a concentration of fractures and faults there. Usually, curvatures are calculated from spatial data after sampling the continuous horizon at discrete points. This sampled geometry of the horizon includes surface undulations of all scales, which are then also included in the calculated curvatures. Including surface undulations of all scales in the curvature analysis leads to noisy and questionable results. We argue that the source data must be filtered prior to curvature analysis to separate different spatial scales of surface undulations, such as broad structures, faults, and sedimentary features. Only those surface undulations that scale with the problem under consideration should then be used in a curvature analysis. For the scale-dependent decomposition of spatial data, we test the suitability of four numerical techniques (Fourier [spectral] analysis, wavelet transform filtering, singular value decomposition, factorial kriging) on a seismically mapped horizon in the North Sea. For surfaces sampled over a regular grid (e.g., seismic data), Fourier (spectral) analysis extracts meaningful curvatures on the scale of broad horizon features, such as structural domes and basins.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. P. Keating and M. P. Fischer An experimental evaluation of the curvature-strain relation in fault-related folds AAPG Bulletin, July 1, 2008; 92(7): 869 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Gross and Y. Eyal Throughgoing fractures in layered carbonate rocks Geological Society of America Bulletin, November 1, 2007; 119(11-12): 1387 - 1404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Lisle and N. C. Toimil Defining folds on three-dimensional surfaces Geology, June 1, 2007; 35(6): 519 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Jolley, D. Barr, J. J. Walsh, and R. J. Knipe Structurally complex reservoirs: an introduction Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 292(1): 1 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bergbauer Testing the predictive capability of curvature analyses Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 292(1): 185 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Ferrill, A. P. Morris, and K. J. Smart Stratigraphic control on extensional fault propagation folding: Big Brushy Canyon monocline, Sierra Del Carmen, Texas Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 292(1): 203 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. Makel The modelling of fractured reservoirs: constraints and potential for fracture network geometry and hydraulics analysis Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2007; 292(1): 375 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Lisle and J. L. Fernandez Martinez Structural analysis of seismically mapped horizons using the developable surface model AAPG Bulletin, July 1, 2005; 89(7): 839 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Pollard, S. Bergbauer, and I. Mynatt Using differential geometry to characterize and analyse the morphology of joints Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2004; 231(1): 153 - 182. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |