Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
AAPG Bulletin SEARCH
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

AAPG Bulletin; May 2002; v. 86; no. 5; p. 797-822; DOI: 10.1306/61EEDBA2-173E-11D7-8645000102C1865D
© 2002 American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stephen, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dalrymple, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Reservoir Simulations Developed from an Outcrop of Incised Valley Fill Strata

Karl D. Stephen1 and Mark Dalrymple2

1 Department of Petroleum Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH14 4AS; Karl.Stephen{at}pet.hw.ac.uk
2 Department of Petroleum Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH14 4AS; dalrymple_mark{at}hotmail.com

Karl Stephen possesses a B.Sc. (hons) degree in physics (1987) from Aberdeen University and a Ph.D. in theoretical and computational physics (1991) from Strathclyde University, United Kingdom. He joined the Scottish Agricultural College, Edinburgh, and modeled the transport of groundwater solutes and gases. In 1996, Karl joined Heriot-Watt University, where he is now a senior research associate researching flow simulation, upscaling, uncertainty, and geological modeling.Mark Dalrymple gained his first degree from the University of Glasgow. An M.Sc. degree in petroleum geology and a Ph.D. in reservoir sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy from the University of Aberdeen (1997) followed. He completed a three-year postdoctoral study at Heriot-Watt University that involved the quantification of large-scale outcrop analogs for the purposes of reservoir modeling and simulation. Mark worked for Alastair Beach Associates for one year before joining Hurricane Hydrocarbons Ltd., where he works as an exploration geologist.

The principal aim of reservoir simulation of this study at outcrop is to quantify the impact that lithological heterogeneity on a scale of one to hundreds of meters has on the production of hydrocarbons from incised valley fill reservoirs. Excellent exposure of an incised valley fill unit in the Kaiparowits Plateau region of southern Utah has enabled high-resolution interpretations of the lithofacies distributions to be adapted as two-dimensional flow simulations. The outcrop section through incised valley fill strata is oriented approximately perpendicular to paleoflow and is above the A sandstone sequence boundary within the Cretaceous Straight Cliffs Formation. The lithofacies, identified as shale, heterolithics, and sand bodies with bounding surfaces, give rise to heterogeneity, predominantly in the vertical direction. The direction of least variability is horizontal and parallel to the paleocurrent.

Petrophysical properties of the lithofacies have been varied by altering the flow properties, thus generating different scenarios and realizations for comparison. This allows the impact of each rock type on the fluid-flow simulation to be quantified. Our simulation results indicate that for linear drive, where horizontal flow is induced by an injector-producer pair, the distributions of zero- and low-permeability shale and heterolithic bodies only affect flow significantly if sand body properties vary significantly. For vertical flow, however, these lithological units strongly affect the flow because of their effects on flow-path tortuousity. Our simulations show that horizontal well placement, parallel to the paleocurrent (i.e., in the direction of least variability), offers the best sweep efficiency, although the well location must be optimized.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
R. P. Sech, M. D. Jackson, and G. J. Hampson
Three-dimensional modeling of a shoreface-shelf parasequence reservoir analog: Part 1. Surface-based modeling to capture high-resolution facies architecture
AAPG Bulletin, September 1, 2009; 93(9): 1155 - 1181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. Howell, A. Vassel, and T. Aune
Modelling of dipping clinoform barriers within deltaic outcrop analogues from the Cretaceous Western Interior Basin, USA
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 309(1): 99 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
Sedimentology and Fractal-Based Analysis of Permeability Data, John Henry Member, Straight Cliffs Formation (Upper Cretaceous), Utah, U.S.A.
Journal of Sedimentary Research, March 1, 2004; 74(2): 270 - 284.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)