Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
AAPG Bulletin SEARCH
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

AAPG Bulletin; November 2002; v. 86; no. 11; p. 1921-1938; DOI: 10.1306/61EEDDBE-173E-11D7-8645000102C1865D
© 2002 American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Curtis, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Unconventional Petroleum Systems

Fractured Shale-Gas Systems

John B. Curtis1

1 Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401; jbcurtis{at}mines.edu

John B. Curtis is associate professor and director, Petroleum Exploration and Production Center/Potential Gas Agency at the Colorado School of Mines. He is an associate editor for the AAPG Bulletin and The Mountain Geologist. As director of the Potential Gas Agency, he works with a team of 145 geologists, geophysicists, and petroleum engineers in their biennial assessment of remaining United States natural gas resources.

The first commercial United States natural gas production (1821) came from an organic-rich Devonian shale in the Appalachian basin. Understanding the geological and geochemical nature of organic shale formations and improving their gas producibility have subsequently been the challenge of millions of dollars worth of research since the 1970s. Shale-gas systems essentially are continuous-type biogenic (predominant), thermogenic, or combined biogenic-thermogenic gas accumulations characterized by widespread gas saturation, subtle trapping mechanisms, seals of variable lithology, and relatively short hydrocarbon migration distances. Shale gas may be stored as free gas in natural fractures and intergranular porosity, as gas sorbed onto kerogen and clay-particle surfaces, or as gas dissolved in kerogen and bitumen.

Five United States shale formations that presently produce gas commercially exhibit an unexpectedly wide variation in the values of five key parameters: thermal maturity (expressed as vitrinite reflectance), sorbed-gas fraction, reservoir thickness, total organic carbon content, and volume of gas in place. The degree of natural fracture development in an otherwise low-matrix-permeability shale reservoir is a controlling factor in gas producibility. To date, unstimulated commercial production has been achievable in only a small proportion of shale wells, those that intercept natural fracture networks. In most other cases, a successful shale-gas well requires hydraulic stimulation. Together, the Devonian Antrim Shale of the Michigan basin and Devonian Ohio Shale of the Appalachian basin accounted for about 84% of the total 380 bcf of shale gas produced in 1999. However, annual gas production is steadily increasing from three other major organic shale formations that subsequently have been explored and developed: the Devonian New Albany Shale in the Illinois basin, the Mississippian Barnett Shale in the Fort Worth basin, and the Cretaceous Lewis Shale in the San Juan basin.

In the basins for which estimates have been made, shale-gas resources are substantial, with in-place volumes of 497-783 tcf. The estimated technically recoverable resource (exclusive of the Lewis Shale) ranges from 31 to 76 tcf. In both cases, the Ohio Shale accounts for the largest share.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
T. Engelder, G. G. Lash, and R. S. Uzcategui
Joint sets that enhance production from Middle and Upper Devonian gas shales of the Appalachian Basin
AAPG Bulletin, July 1, 2009; 93(7): 857 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
A. M. Martini, L. M. Walter, and J. C. McIntosh
Identification of microbial and thermogenic gas components from Upper Devonian black shale cores, Illinois and Michigan basins
AAPG Bulletin, March 1, 2008; 92(3): 327 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
D. J. K. Ross and R. M. Bustin
Characterizing the shale gas resource potential of Devonian Mississippian strata in the Western Canada sedimentary basin: Application of an integrated formation evaluation
AAPG Bulletin, January 1, 2008; 92(1): 87 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
R. M. Pollastro, D. M. Jarvie, R. J. Hill, and C. W. Adams
Geologic framework of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Barnett-Paleozoic total petroleum system, Bend arch-Fort Worth Basin, Texas
AAPG Bulletin, April 1, 2007; 91(4): 405 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
J. J. Hickey and B. Henk
Lithofacies summary of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Mitchell 2 T.P. Sims well, Wise County, Texas
AAPG Bulletin, April 1, 2007; 91(4): 437 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
H. Zhao, N. B. Givens, and B. Curtis
Thermal maturity of the Barnett Shale determined from well-log analysis
AAPG Bulletin, April 1, 2007; 91(4): 535 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
R. M. Pollastro
Total petroleum system assessment of undiscovered resources in the giant Barnett Shale continuous (unconventional) gas accumulation, Fort Worth Basin, Texas
AAPG Bulletin, April 1, 2007; 91(4): 551 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
R. G. Loucks and S. C. Ruppel
Mississippian Barnett Shale: Lithofacies and depositional setting of a deep-water shale-gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin, Texas
AAPG Bulletin, April 1, 2007; 91(4): 579 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
P. E. Binns
Evaluating subtle stratigraphic traps: prospect to portfolio
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2006; 254(1): 7 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth basin, north-central Texas: Gas-shale play with multi-trillion cubic foot potential
AAPG Bulletin, February 1, 2005; 89(2): 155 - 175.



Home page
Petroleum Geology Conference seriesHome page
A. ODEDRA, S. D. BURLEY, A. LEWIS, M. HARDMAN, and P. HAYNES
The world according to gas
Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference series, January 1, 2005; 6(0): 571 - 586.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
The upper Paleozoic coalbed methane system in the Qinshui basin, China
AAPG Bulletin, January 1, 2005; 89(1): 81 - 100.



Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
Unconventional Shallow Biogenic Gas Systems
AAPG Bulletin, November 1, 2002; 86(11): 1939 - 1969.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)