Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
AAPG Bulletin SEARCH
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

AAPG Bulletin; January 2001; v. 85; no. 1; p. 149-167; DOI: 10.1306/8626C785-173B-11D7-8645000102C1865D
© 2001 American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chaika, C.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Chert Reservoirs of North America

Density and Mineralogy Variations as a Function of Porosity in Miocene Monterey Formation Oil and Gas Reservoirs in California

Caren Chaika1 and Loretta Ann Williams2

1 Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305-2115; current address: Occidental of Elk Hills, Inc., P. O. Box 1001, Tupman, California, 93276-1001; caren_chaika{at}oxy.com
2 Independent Consultant, 2354 Moline Street, Aurora, Colorado, 80010; lorettaann53{at}hotmail.com

Caren Chaika received her B.A. degree in geology from Rice University in 1993 and her Ph.D. from Stanford University in 1998, where she combined geology and rock physics to better understand physical property changes during silica diagenesis. She has been a summer geologist for the Naval Research Laboratory at Stennis Space Center, Mississippi, and for the U.S. Geological Survey in Menlo Park, California. She is currently a production geologist with Occidental of Elk Hills, located near Bakersfield, California.Loretta Ann Williams has specialized in fine-grained carbonate and silica source rocks that serve as reservoirs. A past Sproule Award recipient, she holds a B.S. degree from SUNY-Stony Brook, an M.B.A. degree from University of Denver, and a Ph.D. from Princeton University. She served as a Stanford University postdoctoral research affiliate from 1981 to 1983 and as an exploration geologist for Champlin Petroleum from 1984 to 1986. Her career has spanned exploration, production, and remediation consulting. She is with PARSEC Group in Denver, Colorado.

The Miocene Monterey Formation, long known as the critical source rock in California, also includes significant fractured chert and porous diatomite reservoirs. What is not widely recognized is that there are high matrix porosity reservoirs within the opal-CT and quartz-phase rocks. Using density, porosity, and mineralogy data, we have identified two distinct groups of Monterey Formation reservoirs. group 1 porosity changes gradually during silica diagenesis-porosities of 55-70% exist not only in opal-A-dominated samples but also in samples that have undergone the transition from opal-A to opal-CT. In group 2, porosity decreases abruptly at the transition, and rocks below the transition are tight.

The main mineralogic difference between groups 1 and 2 is a higher clay content in group 1, resulting in different silica diagenesis pathways for the two groups. This led us to expect all San Joaquin basin samples to fall into group 1, and all coastal California samples to fall into group 2, because of the different depositional histories of the two areas. Although our prediction holds in most instances, we discovered that some San Joaquin basin samples exhibit group 2 characteristics. Therefore, it is important to use petrophysical, seismic, and/or geological information to determine if a Monterey Formation reservoir is likely to be a fracture-dominated type (group 2) or if there might be a matrix production component (group 1).

Once one has made this diagnosis, the characteristic density/porosity relationships of each group allow one to easily calculate an accurate matrix porosity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
R. J. Davies, N. R. Goulty, and D. Meadows
Fluid flow due to the advance of basin-scale silica reaction zones
Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1, 2008; 120(1-2): 195 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
R. J. Davies
Differential compaction and subsidence in sedimentary basins due to silica diagenesis: A case study
Geological Society of America Bulletin, September 1, 2005; 117(9-10): 1146 - 1155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
K. B. Follmi, C. Badertscher, E. de Kaenel, P. Stille, C. M. John, T. Adatte, and P. Steinmann
Phosphogenesis and organic-carbon preservation in the Miocene Monterey Formation at Naples Beach, California--The Monterey hypothesis revisited
Geological Society of America Bulletin, May 1, 2005; 117(5-6): 589 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Sedimentary ResearchHome page
Carbonaceous and Phosphate-Rich Sediments of the Miocene Monterey Formation at El Capitan State Beach, California, U.S.A.
Journal of Sedimentary Research, March 1, 2002; 72(2): 252 - 267.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)