Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
AAPG Bulletin SEARCH
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

AAPG Bulletin; February 1998; v. 82; no. 2; p. 291-316
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Order Hardcopy of Full Text via AGI/GeoRef
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carter, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Naeser, N. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Heat flow and thermal history of the Anadarko Basin, Oklahoma

Larry S. Carter, Shari A. Kelley, David D. Blackwell, and Nancy D. Naeser

Marathon Oil Company, Tyler, TX, United States
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM, United States
Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, United States
U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, United States

New heat-flow values for seven sites in the Anadarko basin, Oklahoma, were determined using high-precision temperature logs and thermal conductivity measurements from nearly 300 core plugs. Three of the sites are on the northern shelf, three sites are in the deep basin, and one site is in the frontal fault zone of the northern Wichita Mountains. The heat flow decreased from 55 to 64 mW/m2 in the north, and from 39 to 54 mW/m2 in the south, due to a decrease in heat generation in the underlying basement rock toward the south. Lateral lithologic changes in the basin, combined with the change in heat flow across the basin, resulted in an unusual pattern of thermal maturity. The vitrinite reflectance values of the Upper Devonian-Lower Mississippian Woodford formation are highest 30-40 km north-northwest of the deepest part of the basin. The offset in highest reflectance values is due to the contrast in thermal conductivity between the Pennsylvanian "granite wash" section adjacent to the Wichita uplift and the Pennsylvanian shale section to the north. The geothermal gradient in the low-conductivity shale section is elevated relative to the geothermal gradient in the high-conductivity "granite wash" section, thus displacing the highest temperatures to the north of the deepest part of the basin. Apatite fission-track, vitrinite reflectance, and heat-flow data were used to constrain regional aspects of the burial history of the Anadarko basin. By combining these data sets, we infer that at least 1.5 km of denudation has occurred at two sites in the deep Anadarko basin since the early to middle Cenozoic (40 plus or minus 10 m.y.). The timing of the onset of denudation in the southern Anadarko basin coincides with the period of late Eocene erosion observed in the southern Rocky Mountains and in the northern Great Plains. Burial history models for two wells from the deep Anadarko basin predict that shales of the Woodford formation passed through the hydrocarbon maturity window by the end of the Permian. The Late Pennsylvanian-Early Permian section in the deep basin moved into the hydrocarbon maturity window during Mesozoic burial of the region. Presently, the depth interval of the main zone of oil maturation (% Ro = 0.7-0.9) is approximately 2800-3800 m in the eastern deep basin and 2200-3000 m in the western deep basin. The greater depth to the top of the oil maturity zone and larger depth range of the zone in the eastern part of the deep basin are due to the lower heat flow associated with more mafic basement toward the east. The burial history model for the northern shelf indicates that the Woodford formation has been in the early oil maturity zone since the Early Permian.

This record provided courtesy of AGI/GeoRef.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
R. P. Sorenson
A dynamic model for the Permian Panhandle and Hugoton fields, western Anadarko basin
AAPG Bulletin, July 1, 2005; 89(7): 921 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
C. Schardt, J. Yang, and R. Large
Numerical Heat and Fluid-Flow Modeling of the Panorama Volcanic-Hosted Massive Sulfide District, Western Australia
Economic Geology, May 1, 2005; 100(3): 547 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rocky Mountain GeologyHome page
S. A. Kelley and S. A. Kelley
Unroofing of the southern Front Range, Colorado: A view from the Denver Basin
Rocky Mountain Geology, November 1, 2002; 37(2): 189 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rocky Mountain GeologyHome page
S. A. Kelley, S. A. Kelley, and D. D. Blackwell
Subsurface temperatures in the southern Denver Basin, Colorado
Rocky Mountain Geology, November 1, 2002; 37(2): 215 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAPG BulletinHome page
Overpressures in the Anadarko Basin, Southwestern Oklahoma: Static or Dynamic?
AAPG Bulletin, January 1, 2002; 86(1): 145 - 160.





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG)